When lumpens hijack culture, the meaning gets distorted by association. We lose what we consider good and clean and precious.
A case in point is the Swastika symbol. Through history and across many cultures - not only Indian - swastika has been a positive, auspicious symbol. It remained so until Hitler and the Nazi party came along. Today, especially in the Western world, swastika symbol has become a emblem of the nazis and neo- nazis. The symbol's meaning stands degraded and corrupted. The word Aryan has suffered a similar fate.
This point was sharply brought to me during a visit last week to my wife's non Indian colleague. The conversation had taken a turn from discussing words common between colloquial Hindi and Bulgarian, to commonality in Indo- European languages. I had used the example of how Hitler had hooked onto the Aryan theme and that swastika was and remains an auspicious symbol amongst Indians, particularly hindus, buddhists and jains. Even as we were talking, I could see what may have been a shade of incredulity on the carefully polite faces of the listeners. Wasn't this a loss of my culture too? Not by what I had done, but what some lumpen, somewhere else, had done?
That both Indians and the nazis shared swastika and Aryans is known to most educated Indians. But in some instances, it is used an argument to support our pride, "Look how the glory of Aryan race and culture was acknowledged even by Hitler!" Dead wrong. Hitler had approached it from a different direction. If that is in doubt, just consider what the nazi's ideal of the master race, the (nazi) Aryan, looked like: tall, blond, blue eyes. This was a Nordic look, not that of Indo Aryans. We can easily guess that if Hitler had gotten around to occupying India, the (Indian) Aryans would have also gone the way of 'inferior races' and 'mixed blood' types, to the concentration camps, where we Indians would have learnt the superior value of work (camp motto was 'work shall set you free', arbeit macht frei) and also solved our population problem.
By the way, London is trying to fight with similar- themed problem, that of yobs and gun- crimes, as within the past fortnight, three teenagers have been shot dead in South London suburbs. Responding to this, Alan Duncan, a senior Tory politician, said, "The greatest problem we need to address in Britain is that it is steadily becoming decivilised." (London Metro, February 16, 2007; www.metro.co.uk)
The silent majority actively needs to be on its guard if it is to protect its culture, civilisation and values against the yobs and anti- social elements, whether it be in India or Britain. After all, yobs across the world share the same value, that violence is 'cool'. It is time for the majority who think that violence is 'uncool' to also be heard.
-------
For a detailed note on swastika, see wikipedia entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika) . A word of caution, wikipedia entries may be very interesting and mostly accurate, but are neither absolutely reliable nor academically rigorous. So be careful before you use it as a formal reference.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
yo evil!
well someone had to start. i had started one a couple of years back, but never got around to writing in it. probably co-incided with the germination of my modesty! (fake?)
hope your blog has a good innings.
re: your reference to nazis, i can't help but observe about another fact- goebbelsian propoganda by the Brits and their paid agents Max Muller in the 19the century and psuedo secular marxists in the 20th has created and perpetuated nonsensical myths about Aryan Race! Arya- the sanskrit word means ' noble' and no more. swami prakashananda sraswati has written a profound book on this. check it out
good warning against mental slavery!
http://www.thetruehistoryandthereligionofindia.org/
cheers
radesh
I agree that the word 'Arya' in Sanskrit means noble or noble- born, and by affiliation, being civilised. I have come across this usage in Hindi literature, for example, in Jayashankar Prasad's dramas like 'Chandragupta' and 'Dhruvaswamini'.
Moving onto the usage in terms of race. First, race itself is a vague concept. Physical anthropology defines race in genetic terms and denies the validity of commonly understood usage of the word race; latter being closer to ethnicity.
Good that you raised the point about mental slavery. Let's take this up in a separate post.
i love this :-)
and i hope radesh keeps posting his comments.
vivek, this is the kind of stuff you should have started ages ago, but better now than never, i say.
btw, what's the link to the lucknow times edition on the links section for? was it pointing to a specific story or is it just for lucknow-lovers to keep themselves updated on all things 'lakhnavi'?
guru
Post a Comment